Does Java Connection.close rollback?
According to the javadoc, you should try to either commit or roll back before calling the close method. The results otherwise are implementation-defined.
According to the javadoc, you should try to either commit or roll back before calling the close method. The results otherwise are implementation-defined.
PostgreSQL 12 update: there is limited support for top-level PROCEDUREs that can do transaction control. You still cannot manage transactions in regular SQL-callable functions, so the below remains true except when using the new top-level procedures. Functions are part of the transaction they’re called from. Their effects are rolled back if the transaction rolls back. … Read more
TransactionScope is not only for the databases. Every component that implements IEnlistmentNotification interface can participate in two-phase commit of the transaction scope. Here is an example of transactional in-memory storage: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/Transactional_Repository.aspx Also, I’m not sure if there are components in .NET for transactional file IO, but it is pretty easy to implement such component – … Read more
By its documentation, pyodbc does support transactions, but only if the odbc driver support it. Furthermore, as pyodbc is compliant with PEP 249, data is stored only when a manual commit is done. This means that you have to explicitely commit() the transaction, or rollback() the entire transaction. Note that pyodbc also support autocommit feature, … Read more
You’re looking for Transactional NTFS, introduced by Windows Vista. Here is a managed wrapper.
Your loop can be optimized by pulling the prepare and bind_param statements out of the loop. $value = null; $mysqli->autocommit(FALSE); $sql = “INSERT INTO temp (`fund_id`) VALUES (?)”; $stmt = $mysqli->prepare($sql); $stmt->bind_param(‘i’, $value); foreach ($pdata as $value) { $stmt->execute(); } $mysqli->commit(); You have turned off autocommit with your autocommit(FALSE) line and therefore don’t need to … Read more
You need to return a promise from the inner query in order for the outer chain to be chained with that. You also swallow any errors because you don’t rethrow them – it’s better to use .catch() for this reason because it makes it more clearer what is happening – that is what would happen … Read more
No, transactions are not rolled back as soon as an error occurs. But you may be using a client-application which applies this policy. For example, if you are using the mysql command-line client, then it normally stops executing when an error occurs and will quit. Quitting while a transaction is in progress does cause it … Read more
Let me go through your cases and explain how these locks work: 1 case T1 wants to update some rows in your test table. This transaction puts IX lock on all table and X lock on the first 5 rows. T2 wants to update some rows in your test table. This transaction puts IX (because … Read more
RequiresNew does not create a nested transaction because the first transaction is suspended while the second transaction is running. A nested transaction looks like this: Nested transaction example > method1 – begin tran1 > method2 – begin tran2 workA < method2 – commit tran2 < method1 – rollback tran1 (tran2 also rolled back because it’s … Read more