To make it short, there was a library in the stack that was not instrumented just starting with frame #2. This seems to cause Tsan to omit the rest of the stack too.
The history setting did not help.
Thanks anyways.
More Related Contents:
- Is gcc 4.8 or earlier buggy about regular expressions?
- Static variables initialisation order
- Constructor initialization-list evaluation order
- gcc optimization flag -O3 makes code slower than -O2
- Visual C++ equivalent of GCC’s __attribute__ ((__packed__))
- What are the GCC default include directories?
- C++11 aggregate initialization for classes with non-static member initializers
- constexpr and initialization of a static const void pointer with reinterpret cast, which compiler is right?
- Can I use C++11 with Xcode?
- Undefined reference to static const int
- How do I call “cpuid” in Linux?
- What is the purpose of using -pedantic in the GCC/G++ compiler?
- Order of evaluation of elements in list-initialization
- gcc: undefined reference to
- When is it necessary to use the flag -stdlib=libstdc++?
- constexpr initializing static member using static function
- Implicit conversion from char** to const char**
- OSX – replace gcc version 4.2.1 with 4.9 installed via Homebrew
- What does the fpermissive flag do?
- How can I turn on (literally) ALL of GCC’s warnings?
- How to update GCC in MinGW on Windows?
- Compiling a Win32 GUI app (without a console) using MinGW and Eclipse
- GCC -Wuninitialized / -Wmaybe-uninitialized issues
- sizeof(struct) returns unexpected value
- Referencing memory operands in .intel_syntax GNU C inline assembly
- What is the branch in the destructor reported by gcov?
- Default libraries linked in by gcc?
- Multiple “could not be resolved” problems using Eclipse with minGW
- const auto std::initializer_list difference between Clang and GCC
- Undefined reference to process(std::__cxx11::basic_string … ) when compiling affdex linux sample applications