Assuming foo
is a simple POD user-defined type used in an array, those 2 statements are certainly not the same. As you may know, all the following has the same semantic meaning for the above context:
*foo
*(foo + 0)
foo[0]
0[foo]
If you take the 2 statements and substitute them with the 3rd form you get:
(*foo)[i].bar ==> foo[0][i].bar
vs
foo[i]->bar ==> (*foo[i]).bar ==> foo[i][0].bar
You can confirm this with a simple test:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
struct foo_t
{
int bar;
};
int main()
{
foo_t foo[2][2] = { { {0xdeadbeef}, {0xbadbeef} },
{ {0xbadf00d}, {0xdecafbad} } };
assert((*foo)[1].bar == foo[0][1].bar);
assert(foo[1]->bar == foo[1][0].bar);
assert(foo[1]->bar != (*foo)[1].bar);
printf("(*foo)[1].bar: %x\n", (*foo)[1].bar);
printf("foo[1]->bar: %x\n", foo[1]->bar);
}
If they were the same, the 3rd assertion would have failed and the output would not be what it is.