C : is there “lazy evaluation” when using && operator, as in C++?

by

Yes && is short circuited and you are using it correctly.
If next is NULL string compare will never happen.

More Related Contents:

  1. Using boolean values in C
  2. Is bool a native C type?
  3. Objective-C : BOOL vs bool
  4. Parameter evaluation order before a function calling in C [duplicate]
  5. C99 boolean data type?
  6. What is “!!” in C? [duplicate]
  7. What is the purpose of the unary plus (+) operator in C?
  8. Why is a condition like (0 < a < 5) always true?
  9. Difference between _Bool and bool types in C?
  10. Setting extra bits in a bool makes it true and false at the same time
  11. Should C compilers immediately free "further unused" memories? [closed]
  12. how many bytes is this struct? – how many bytes is pointer to a struct? [closed]
  13. Why does printf not flush after the call unless a newline is in the format string?
  14. Why is the use of alloca() not considered good practice?
  15. Using LEA on values that aren’t addresses / pointers?
  16. Display an array of color in C [closed]
  17. How to test a static function
  18. Atomicity of `write(2)` to a local filesystem
  19. Rand Implementation
  20. C++ : why bool is 8 bits long?
  21. Can I get Unix’s pthread.h to compile in Windows?
  22. Why does open() create my file with the wrong permissions?
  23. Optimized matrix multiplication in C
  24. C – initialization of pointers, asterisk position [duplicate]
  25. multiple word string input through scanf( )
  26. segmentation fault using scanf with integer
  27. Reductions in parallel in logarithmic time
  28. Dynamic method dispatching in C
  29. how do compilers assign memory addresses to variables?
  30. Swift: How to call a C function loaded from a dylib

Leave a Comment