Const variable changed with pointer in C

by

const is a compile-time feature.
It doesn’t prevent you from shooting yourself in the foot; that’s what the warning is for.

More Related Contents:

  1. What is the difference between const int*, const int * const, and int const *?
  2. Why isn’t it legal to convert “pointer to pointer to non-const” to a “pointer to pointer to const”
  3. Does const-correctness give the compiler more room for optimization?
  4. C++ typedef interpretation of const pointers
  5. Modifying a const int in C++ [duplicate]
  6. Pointer to array with const qualifier in C & C++
  7. C++: Why is const_cast evil?
  8. Returning non-const reference from a const member function
  9. Use const wherever possible in C++?
  10. non-const pointer argument to a const double pointer parameter
  11. Avoid memory leaks in C++ Pointers [closed]
  12. Difference between list<Observer*>* and list<Observer*> in C++ [closed]
  13. When were pointers added to C / C++? [closed]
  14. Odd error: ‘FILE *’ differs in levels of indirection from ‘FILE’ [closed]
  15. Is it a good idea to typedef pointers?
  16. What is the type of string literals in C and C++?
  17. Function does not change passed pointer C++
  18. Why use pointers? [closed]
  19. C++: const reference, before vs after type-specifier
  20. How many and which are the uses of “const” in C++?
  21. Conversion of pointer-to-pointer between derived and base classes?
  22. What is the default constructor for C++ pointer?
  23. Difference between pointer to a reference and reference to a pointer
  24. What is the use of intptr_t?
  25. Is Pointer-to- ” inner struct” member forbidden?
  26. Why can’t I do polymorphism with normal variables?
  27. Isn’t the const modifier here unnecessary? [duplicate]
  28. Static global variables in C++
  29. Where ampersand “&” can be put when passing argument by reference?
  30. Polymorphism & Pointers to arrays [duplicate]

Leave a Comment