Could I ever want to access the address zero?

by

Neither in C nor in C++ null-pointer value is in any way tied to physical address 0. The fact that you use constant 0 in the source code to set a pointer to null-pointer value is nothing more than just a piece of syntactic sugar. The compiler is required to translate it into the actual physical address used as null-pointer value on the specific platform.

In other words, 0 in the source code has no physical importance whatsoever. It could have been 42 or 13, for example. I.e. the language authors, if they so pleased, could have made it so that you’d have to do p = 42 in order to set the pointer p to null-pointer value. Again, this does not mean that the physical address 42 would have to be reserved for null pointers. The compiler would be required to translate source code p = 42 into machine code that would stuff the actual physical null-pointer value (0x0000 or 0xBAAD) into the pointer p. That’s exactly how it is now with constant 0.

Also note, that neither C nor C++ provides a strictly defined feature that would allow you to assign a specific physical address to a pointer. So your question about “how one would assign 0 address to a pointer” formally has no answer. You simply can’t assign a specific address to a pointer in C/C++. However, in the realm of implementation-defined features, the explicit integer-to-pointer conversion is intended to have that effect. So, you’d do it as follows

uintptr_t address = 0;
void *p = (void *) address;

Note, that this is not the same as doing

void *p = 0;

The latter always produces the null-pointer value, while the former in general case does not. The former will normally produce a pointer to physical address 0, which might or might not be the null-pointer value on the given platform.

More Related Contents:

  1. Why is sizeof giving incorrect number of bytes in C++?
  2. Is the sizeof(some pointer) always equal to four?
  3. Why aren’t pointers initialized with NULL by default?
  4. Why is address zero used for the null pointer?
  5. Difference between pointer to a reference and reference to a pointer
  6. Create new C++ object at specific memory address?
  7. Can I Allocate a specific memory address using pointers in c++?
  8. Dereferencing deleted pointers always result in an Access Violation?
  9. how do arrays work internally in c/c++
  10. Is `&variable = null;` possible? [closed]
  11. Calling a pointer function in C++
  12. C++ Memory Leak Using char *
  13. What are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?
  14. When should static_cast, dynamic_cast, const_cast and reinterpret_cast be used?
  15. What is the difference between char a[] = ?string?; and char *p = ?string?;?
  16. Why isn’t it legal to convert “pointer to pointer to non-const” to a “pointer to pointer to const”
  17. May I treat a 2D array as a contiguous 1D array?
  18. Pointer address in a C multidimensional array
  19. Is a pointer with the right address and type still always a valid pointer since C++17?
  20. Should I store entire objects, or pointers to objects in containers?
  21. error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ‘int&’ from an rvalue of type ‘int’
  22. Can the “Application Error” dialog box be disabled?
  23. Does accessing a declared non-volatile object through a volatile reference/pointer confer volatile rules upon said accesses?
  24. Can raw pointers be used instead of iterators with STL algorithms for containers with linear storage?
  25. Is pointer comparison undefined or unspecified behavior in C++?
  26. What is the uintptr_t data type?
  27. Pointer array and sizeof confusion
  28. How to sort a linked list using bubble-sort?
  29. How to ignore false positive memory leaks from _CrtDumpMemoryLeaks?
  30. Assign a string literal to a char* [duplicate]

Leave a Comment