dereferencing the null pointer

by

The answer to this question is: it depends which language standard you are following :-).

In C90 and C++, this is not valid because you perform indirection on the null pointer (by doing *p), and doing so results in undefined behavior.

However, in C99, this is valid, well-formed, and well-defined. In C99, if the operand of the unary-& was obtained as the result of applying the unary-* or by performing subscripting ([]), then neither the & nor the * or [] is applied. For example:

int* p = 0;
int* q = &*p; // In C99, this is equivalent to int* q = p;

Likewise,

int* p = 0;
int* q = &p[0]; // In C99, this is equivalent to int* q = p + 0;

From C99 ยง6.5.3.2/3:

If the operand [of the unary & operator] is the result of a unary * operator, neither that operator nor the & operator is evaluated and the result is as if both were omitted, except that the constraints on the operators still apply and the result is not an lvalue.

Similarly, if the operand is the result of a [] operator, neither the & operator nor the unary * that is implied by the [] is evaluated and the result is as if the & operator were removed and the [] operator were changed to a + operator.

(and its footnote, #84):

Thus, &*E is equivalent to E (even if E is a null pointer)

More Related Contents:

  1. determine size of array if passed to function
  2. Is it good practice to NULL a pointer after deleting it?
  3. Testing pointers for validity (C/C++)
  4. NULL vs nullptr (Why was it replaced?) [duplicate]
  5. C++ standard: dereferencing NULL pointer to get a reference? [duplicate]
  6. Checking if this is null
  7. Is there any reason to check for a NULL pointer before deleting?
  8. Can I use if (pointer) instead of if (pointer != NULL)?
  9. Why are NULL pointers defined differently in C and C++?
  10. Is it legal/well-defined C++ to call a non-static method that doesn’t access members through a null pointer?
  11. Avoid memory leaks in C++ Pointers [closed]
  12. Difference between list<Observer*>* and list<Observer*> in C++ [closed]
  13. When were pointers added to C / C++? [closed]
  14. For loop with pointers and a terminating null
  15. Odd error: ‘FILE *’ differs in levels of indirection from ‘FILE’ [closed]
  16. Is it a good idea to typedef pointers?
  17. Function does not change passed pointer C++
  18. Why use pointers? [closed]
  19. Conversion of pointer-to-pointer between derived and base classes?
  20. What is the default constructor for C++ pointer?
  21. Uninitialized pointers in code
  22. Do all pointers have the same size in C++?
  23. can’t modify char* – Memory access violation
  24. c++ delete pointer issue, can still access data [closed]
  25. Using a C string gives a warning: “Address of stack memory associated with local variable returned”
  26. Get base address of process
  27. What is the proper way to return an object from a C++ function?
  28. Can I call memcpy() and memmove() with “number of bytes” set to zero?
  29. Displaying the address of a string
  30. Both asterisk and ampersand in a parameter

Leave a Comment