Differences between numpy.random and random.random in Python

by

You have made many correct observations already!

Unless you’d like to seed both of the random generators, it’s probably simpler in the long run to choose one generator or the other. But if you do need to use both, then yes, you’ll also need to seed them both, because they generate random numbers independently of each other.

For numpy.random.seed(), the main difficulty is that it is not thread-safe – that is, it’s not safe to use if you have many different threads of execution, because it’s not guaranteed to work if two different threads are executing the function at the same time. If you’re not using threads, and if you can reasonably expect that you won’t need to rewrite your program this way in the future, numpy.random.seed() should be fine. If there’s any reason to suspect that you may need threads in the future, it’s much safer in the long run to do as suggested, and to make a local instance of the numpy.random.Random class. As far as I can tell, random.random.seed() is thread-safe (or at least, I haven’t found any evidence to the contrary).

The numpy.random library contains a few extra probability distributions commonly used in scientific research, as well as a couple of convenience functions for generating arrays of random data. The random.random library is a little more lightweight, and should be fine if you’re not doing scientific research or other kinds of work in statistics.

Otherwise, they both use the Mersenne twister sequence to generate their random numbers, and they’re both completely deterministic – that is, if you know a few key bits of information, it’s possible to predict with absolute certainty what number will come next. For this reason, neither numpy.random nor random.random is suitable for any serious cryptographic uses. But because the sequence is so very very long, both are fine for generating random numbers in cases where you aren’t worried about people trying to reverse-engineer your data. This is also the reason for the necessity to seed the random value – if you start in the same place each time, you’ll always get the same sequence of random numbers!

As a side note, if you do need cryptographic level randomness, you should use the secrets module, or something like Crypto.Random if you’re using a Python version earlier than Python 3.6.

More Related Contents:

  1. random.seed(): What does it do?
  2. Should I use `random.seed` or `numpy.random.seed` to control random number generation in `scikit-learn`?
  3. Is there a way to ordinate numbers in a list?
  4. Python random.choice same output
  5. Randomly generate 4 or 5 digit Unique Codes in Subsequent Runs of the Script
  6. How to select random key with common values?
  7. Why does random.shuffle return None?
  8. How to get a random value from dictionary?
  9. Weighted random selection with and without replacement
  10. Generate random numbers summing to a predefined value
  11. Generate a random derangement of a list
  12. Shuffle an array with python, randomize array item order with python
  13. How to get two random records with Django
  14. Weighted random sample in python
  15. Select 50 items from list at random
  16. Reproducible results in Tensorflow with tf.set_random_seed
  17. How to generate a repeatable random number sequence?
  18. How to specify upper and lower limits when using numpy.random.normal
  19. How to make a reproducible data sample in PowerBI using Python?
  20. Choosing a function randomly
  21. How do I pick 2 random items from a Python set? [duplicate]
  22. How can I get a random key-value pair from a dictionary?
  23. How to generate a random normal distribution of integers
  24. Generating non-repeating random numbers in Python
  25. Weighted random sample without replacement in python
  26. Set.pop() isn’t random?
  27. Getting random row through SQLAlchemy
  28. Working with floating point NumPy arrays for comparison and related operations
  29. Generate random locations within a triangular domain
  30. Best way to choose a random file from a directory

Leave a Comment