It’s ill-formed in C++. Meaning that it doesn’t compile with a standard conforming compiler. Paragraph 7.1.5/4 in Annex C of the Standard explains the change “Banning implicit int”.
More Related Contents:
- i dont know this use of struct and pointers
- Using local variable outside its scope
- Operator precedence and operator associativity rules in c++ [duplicate]
- Regarding time out in code
- What are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?
- Operator[][] overload
- How to turn on (literally) ALL of GCC’s warnings?
- Why can’t simple initialize (with braces) 2D std::array? [duplicate]
- What’s the scope of inline friend functions?
- How to convert std::string to LPCWSTR in C++ (Unicode)
- How can I get double quotes into a string literal?
- Determine if a type is an STL container at compile time
- How to recompile with -fPIC
- Is this infinite recursion UB?
- Sharing a global/static variable between a process and DLL
- Inherit interfaces which share a method name
- Can I use Visual Studio 2010’s C++ compiler with Visual Studio 2008’s C++ Runtime Library?
- Repeated Multiple Definition Errors from including same header in multiple cpps
- What is the default value for C++ class members
- Defining global constant in C++
- How to enable C++11 in CLion?
- How to emulate _mm256_loadu_epi32 with gcc or clang?
- C++ placement new
- c++ data alignment /member order & inheritance
- Get size of terminal window (rows/columns)
- Calculate rolling / moving average in C++
- _GNU_SOURCE and __USE_GNU
- Using an iterator to Divide an Array into Parts with Unequal Size
- Creating a new object from dynamic type info
- Why does Boost.Asio not support an event-based interface?