As commented earlier, it’s because you reached the number of rows of sys.columns
. Here is another way to generate list of numbers or what others call Numbers Table
or Tally Table
.
This uses cascaded CTE
s and is said to be the fastest way to create a Tally Table:
DECLARE @Range AS INT = 7374
;WITH E1(N) AS( -- 10 ^ 1 = 10 rows
SELECT 1 FROM(VALUES (1),(1),(1),(1),(1),(1),(1),(1),(1),(1))t(N)
),
E2(N) AS(SELECT 1 FROM E1 a CROSS JOIN E1 b), -- 10 ^ 2 = 100 rows
E4(N) AS(SELECT 1 FROM E2 a CROSS JOIN E2 b), -- 10 ^ 4 = 10,000 rows
E8(N) AS(SELECT 1 FROM E4 a CROSS JOIN E4 b), -- 10 ^ 8 = 10,000,000 rows
CteTally(N) AS(
SELECT TOP(@Range) ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY(SELECT NULL))
FROM E8
)
SELECT * FROM CteTally
You could easily add another CTE if you need more than 10,000 rows.
For more information about Tally Table, read this excellent article by Jeff Moden.
For performance comparisons among ways to generate Tally Tables, read this.
Explanation taken from Jeff’s article:
The CTE called
E1
(as in 10E1 for scientific notation) is nothing
more than tenSELECT 1
‘s returned as a single result set.
E2
does aCROSS JOIN
ofE1
with itself. That returns a single
result set of 10*10 or up to 100 rows. I say “up to” because if the
TOP function is 100 or less, the CTE’s are “smart” enough to know that
it doesn’t actually need to go any further andE4
andE8
won’t
even come into play. If theTOP
has a value of less than 100, not
all 100 rows thatE2
is capable of making will be made. It’ll always
make just enough according to theTOP
function.You can follow from there.
E4
is aCROSS JOIN
ofE2
and will
make up to 100*100 or 10,000 rows andE8
is aCROSS JOIN
ofE4
which will make more rows than most people will ever need. If you do
need more, then just add anE16
as aCROSS JOIN
ofE8
and change
the finalFROM
clause toFROM E16
.What’s really amazing about this bad-boy is that is produces ZERO
READS. Absolutely none, nada, nil.