If you need to iterate over a queue
then you need something more than a queue. The point of the standard container adapters is to provide a minimal interface. If you need to do iteration as well, why not just use a deque (or list) instead?
More Related Contents:
- Iterator invalidation rules for C++ containers
- What’s the difference between “STL” and “C++ Standard Library”?
- How can you iterate over the elements of an std::tuple?
- How to convert an instance of std::string to lower case
- std::string formatting like sprintf
- What are the mechanics of short string optimization in libc++?
- Writing your own STL Container
- How can I loop through a C++ map of maps?
- Deleting elements from std::set while iterating
- Can I take the address of a function defined in standard library?
- How to get IOStream to perform better?
- C++11 thread-safe queue
- C++ valarray vs. vector
- How to make generic computations over heterogeneous argument packs of a variadic template function?
- Forward declare a standard container?
- C++ std::vector vs array in the real world
- What does string::npos mean in this code?
- Why is there no transform_if in the C++ standard library?
- C++ Filehandling: Difference between ios::app and ios::ate?
- How to iterate over a priority_queue?
- Assign a nullptr to a std::string is safe?
- GCC linker can’t find standard library?
- Why is the STL so heavily based on templates instead of inheritance?
- std::lexical_cast – is there such a thing?
- How to clone object in C++ ? Or Is there another solution?
- Why do we need to tie std::cin and std::cout?
- Insert into an STL queue using std::copy
- priority queue with limited space: looking for a good algorithm
- How can I use a std::valarray to store/manipulate a contiguous 2D array?
- Why is operator!= removed in C++20 for many standard library types?