SynchronizationContext.Current is null in Continuation on the main UI thread

The issue is fixed in .NET 4.5 RC (just tested it). So I assume it is a bug in .NET 4.0.
Also, I’m guessing that these posts are referencing the same issue:

• How can SynchronizationContext.Current of the main thread become null in a Windows Forms application?
• http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wcf/thread/629d5524-c8db-466f-bc27-0ced11b441ba

That’s unfortunate. Now I have to consider workarounds.

Edit:
From debugging into the .Net source, I have a little better understanding of when the issue would reproduce. Here’s some relevant code from ExecutionContext.cs:

        internal static void Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback,  Object state, bool ignoreSyncCtx) 
        {
            // ... Some code excluded here ...

            ExecutionContext ec = Thread.CurrentThread.GetExecutionContextNoCreate();
            if ( (ec == null || ec.IsDefaultFTContext(ignoreSyncCtx)) &&
#if FEATURE_IMPERSONATION || FEATURE_COMPRESSEDSTACK
                SecurityContext.CurrentlyInDefaultFTSecurityContext(ec) && 
#endif // #if FEATURE_IMPERSONATION || FEATURE_COMPRESSEDSTACK
                executionContext.IsDefaultFTContext(ignoreSyncCtx)) 
            { 
                callback(state);
            } 
            else
            {
                if (executionContext == s_dummyDefaultEC)
                    executionContext = s_dummyDefaultEC.CreateCopy(); 
                RunInternal(executionContext, callback, state);
            } 
        } 

The issue only reproduces when we get into the “else” clause which calls RunInternal. This is because the RunInternal ends up replacing the the ExecutionContext which has the effect of changing what the current SynchronizationContext:

        // Get the current SynchronizationContext on the current thread 
        public static SynchronizationContext Current 
        {
            get
            { 
                SynchronizationContext context = null;
                ExecutionContext ec = Thread.CurrentThread.GetExecutionContextNoCreate(); 
                if (ec != null) 
                {
                    context = ec.SynchronizationContext; 
                }

                // ... Some code excluded ...
                return context;
            }
        } 

So, for my specific case, it was because the line `executionContext.IsDefaultFTContext(ignoreSyncCtx)) returned false. Here’s that code:

        internal bool IsDefaultFTContext(bool ignoreSyncCtx)
        { 
#if FEATURE_CAS_POLICY 
            if (_hostExecutionContext != null)
                return false; 
#endif // FEATURE_CAS_POLICY
#if FEATURE_SYNCHRONIZATIONCONTEXT
            if (!ignoreSyncCtx && _syncContext != null)
                return false; 
#endif // #if FEATURE_SYNCHRONIZATIONCONTEXT
#if FEATURE_IMPERSONATION || FEATURE_COMPRESSEDSTACK 
            if (_securityContext != null && !_securityContext.IsDefaultFTSecurityContext()) 
                return false;
#endif //#if FEATURE_IMPERSONATION || FEATURE_COMPRESSEDSTACK 
            if (_logicalCallContext != null && _logicalCallContext.HasInfo)
                return false;
            if (_illogicalCallContext != null && _illogicalCallContext.HasUserData)
                return false; 
            return true;
        } 

For me, that was returning false due to _logicalCallContext.HasInfo was true. Here’s that code:

public bool HasInfo
{ 
    [System.Security.SecurityCritical]  // auto-generated
    get
    {
        bool fInfo = false; 

        // Set the flag to true if there is either remoting data, or 
        // security data or user data 
        if(
            (m_RemotingData != null &&  m_RemotingData.HasInfo) || 
            (m_SecurityData != null &&  m_SecurityData.HasInfo) ||
            (m_HostContext != null) ||
            HasUserData
          ) 
        {
            fInfo = true; 
        } 

        return fInfo; 
    }
}

For me, this was returning true because HasUserData was true. Here’s that code:

    internal bool HasUserData
    {
        get { return ((m_Datastore != null) && (m_Datastore.Count > 0));} 
    }

For me, the m_DataStore would have items in it due to my call to Diagnostics.Trace.CorrelationManager.StartLogicalOperation("LogicalOperation");

In summary, it looks like there are several different ways you could get the bug to reproduce. Hopefully, this example will serve to help others in determining if they are running into this same bug or not.