Question about C behaviour for unsigned integer underflow

ยง6.2.5, paragraph 9: A computation involving unsigned operands can never overflow, because a result that cannot be represented by the resulting unsigned integer type is reduced modulo the number that is one greater than the largest value that can be represented by the resulting type. Edit: Sorry, wrong reference, but the result is still pinned … Read more

Why is unsigned integer overflow defined behavior but signed integer overflow isn’t?

The historical reason is that most C implementations (compilers) just used whatever overflow behaviour was easiest to implement with the integer representation it used. C implementations usually used the same representation used by the CPU – so the overflow behavior followed from the integer representation used by the CPU. In practice, it is only the … Read more

How does Java handle integer underflows and overflows and how would you check for it?

If it overflows, it goes back to the minimum value and continues from there. If it underflows, it goes back to the maximum value and continues from there. You can check that beforehand as follows: public static boolean willAdditionOverflow(int left, int right) { if (right < 0 && right != Integer.MIN_VALUE) { return willSubtractionOverflow(left, -right); … Read more