Memory Mapped Files .NET
I know this is a bit late, but the .NET 4.0 framework now supports memory-mapped files out of the box: http://blogs.msdn.com/salvapatuel/archive/2009/06/08/working-with-memory-mapped-files-in-net-4.aspx
I know this is a bit late, but the .NET 4.0 framework now supports memory-mapped files out of the box: http://blogs.msdn.com/salvapatuel/archive/2009/06/08/working-with-memory-mapped-files-in-net-4.aspx
Multi maps aren’t laid out sequentially in memory. (They’re node-based containers, but I digress). In fact, even if they were, chances would be slim that the layout would match that of the text input. There’s basically two ways you can make this work: Keep using the multimap but use a custom allocator (so that all … Read more
The following shows Pascal Script implementation of the code from How to: Get Progress from the .NET Framework 4.5 Installer [Files] Source: “NDP462-KB3151800-x86-x64-AllOS-ENU.exe”; Flags: dontcopy [Code] // Change to unique names const SectionName=”MyProgSetup”; EventName=”MyProgSetupEvent”; const INFINITE = 65535; WAIT_OBJECT_0 = 0; WAIT_TIMEOUT = $00000102; FILE_MAP_WRITE = $0002; E_PENDING = $8000000A; S_OK = 0; MMIO_V45 = … Read more
You’re being too conservative: A memory-mapped file can be larger than the address space. The view of the memory-mapped file is limited by OS memory constraints, but that’s only the part of the file you’re looking at at one time. (And I guess technically you could map multiple views of discontinuous parts of the file … Read more
mmap works differently. It is anticipatory and adapts to the program’s access pattern. Also, specific policies can be set via madvise to further fine tune usage. For a much more thorough discussion of how mmap works in a demand paging environment, see my answer here: Which segments are affected by a copy-on-write? as it also … Read more
Following static method could be used: public static void unmap(MappedByteBuffer buffer) { sun.misc.Cleaner cleaner = ((DirectBuffer) buffer).cleaner(); cleaner.clean(); } But this is unsafe solution because of following: 1) Lead to failures if someone use MappedByteBuffer after unmap 2) It relies on MappedByteBuffer implementation details