Update Microsoft just added browser based merges. This may get you out of a pickle for small conflicts. And offers improved visualizations of the different scenarios as of Sprint 150. For more complex situations: You have two options to resolve the conflict, reverse-integrate the changes from the target branch (which creates additional merge commits), or … Read more
It can be shared via a dedicated branch. You want to stop if there is a conflict on that branch and resolve it as it means that there were attempts to solve the same conflict in 2 different ways. Needless to say, that will be the exception to the rule. For the others on this … Read more
The conflict message: CONFLICT (delete/modify): res/layout/dialog_item.xml deleted in dialog and modified in HEAD means that res/layout/dialog_item.xml was deleted in the ‘dialog’ branch you are merging, but was modified in HEAD (in the branch you are merging to). So you have to decide whether remove file using “git rm res/layout/dialog_item.xml“ or accept version from HEAD (perhaps … Read more
What is currently happening is, that you have a certain set of files, which you have tried merging earlier, but they threw up merge conflicts. Ideally, if one gets a merge conflict, he should resolve them manually, and commit the changes using git add file.name && git commit -m “removed merge conflicts”. Now, another user … Read more
git checkout accepts an –ours or –theirs option for cases like this. So if you have a merge conflict, and you know you just want the file from the branch you are merging in, you can do: $ git checkout –theirs — path/to/conflicted-file.txt to use that version of the file. Likewise, if you know you … Read more
Have a look at http://sqlite.org/lang_conflict.html. You want something like: insert or replace into Book (ID, Name, TypeID, Level, Seen) values ((select ID from Book where Name = “SearchName”), “SearchName”, …); Note that any field not in the insert list will be set to NULL if the row already exists in the table. This is why … Read more
Those are conflict markers. You’re still in the process of merging, but there were some parts that Git couldn’t merge automatically. You’ll need to hand-edit those parts to what you want them to be and then commit the results. For instance, in your particular case, you’d probably want to resolve it like this (note – … Read more
How do I resolve merge conflicts in a Git repository?