What could C/C++ “lose” if they defined a standard ABI?

by

The freedom to implement things in the most natural way on each processor.

I imagine that c in particular has conforming implementations on more different architectures than any other language. Abiding by a ABI optimized for the currently common, high-end, general-purpose CPUs would require unnatural contortions on some the odder machines out there.

More Related Contents:

  1. Using paragraphs 8.5.3p4 and p5 in the C++11 Standard, how do I prove that the snippet below doesn’t compile?
  2. What are the rules about using an underscore in a C++ identifier?
  3. Are std::vector elements guaranteed to be contiguous?
  4. Take the address of a one-past-the-end array element via subscript: legal by the C++ Standard or not?
  5. What are the new features in C++17?
  6. How to determine the version of the C++ standard used by the compiler?
  7. Where exactly does C++ standard say dereferencing an uninitialized pointer is undefined behavior?
  8. Is it legal to recurse into main() in C++? [duplicate]
  9. Using Unicode in C++ source code
  10. C++ Static member method call on class instance
  11. Why do const references extend the lifetime of rvalues?
  12. Is there a way to access the underlying container of STL container adaptors?
  13. Is right shift undefined behavior if the count is larger than the width of the type?
  14. Why is a boolean 1 byte and not 1 bit of size?
  15. GCC ABI compatibility
  16. Why is `i = ++i + 1` unspecified behavior?
  17. std::vector and contiguous memory of multidimensional arrays
  18. Why an unnamed namespace is a “superior” alternative to static? [duplicate]
  19. Are there stackless or heapless implementation of C++?
  20. Why can a T* be passed in register, but a unique_ptr cannot?
  21. When can you omit the file extension in an #include directive?
  22. Does new[] call default constructor in C++?
  23. Why statements cannot appear at namespace scope?
  24. C++ Modules – why were they removed from C++0x? Will they be back later on?
  25. Is a C++ preprocessor identical to a C preprocessor?
  26. Is it unspecified behavior to compare pointers to different arrays for equality?
  27. Setting extra bits in a bool makes it true and false at the same time
  28. Can I legally reinterpret_cast between layout-compatible standard-layout types?
  29. Can we apply content not explicitly cited from the normative references to the C++ standard?
  30. Why is using exit() considered bad? [duplicate]

Leave a Comment