Why dereferencing a null pointer is undefined behaviour?

by

Defining consistent behavior for dereferencing a NULL pointer would require the compiler to check for NULL pointers before each dereference on most CPU architectures. This is an unacceptable burden for a language that is designed for speed.

It also only fixes a small part of a larger problem – there are many ways to have an invalid pointer beyond a NULL pointer.

More Related Contents:

  1. Is segmentation fault actual undefined behavior when we refer to a non-static data-member
  2. C++ delete – It deletes my objects but I can still access the data?
  3. May I treat a 2D array as a contiguous 1D array?
  4. May I take the address of the one-past-the-end element of an array? [duplicate]
  5. Is pointer comparison undefined or unspecified behavior in C++?
  6. Are pointer variables just integers with some operators or are they “symbolic”?
  7. Matrix Printing using Pointers [closed]
  8. Changing the object a pointer points to in c++
  9. Accessing inactive union member and undefined behavior?
  10. Does initialization entail lvalue-to-rvalue conversion? Is `int x = x;` UB?
  11. How could pairing new[] with delete possibly lead to memory leak only?
  12. Why aren’t pointers initialized with NULL by default?
  13. Why is address zero used for the null pointer?
  14. Address of an array
  15. Does const-correctness give the compiler more room for optimization?
  16. Are multiple mutations within initializer lists undefined behavior?
  17. A C++ implementation that detects undefined behavior?
  18. Get pointer to object from pointer to some member
  19. Explanation of function pointers
  20. How to allocate a 2D array of pointers in C++
  21. Is infinite loop still undefined behavior in C++ if it calls shared library?
  22. Mixing class and struct
  23. Character pointers and integer pointers (++)
  24. Can branches with undefined behavior be assumed unreachable and optimized as dead code?
  25. Confusion about pointers and references in C++
  26. Returning non-const reference from a const member function
  27. behavior of const_cast in C++ [duplicate]
  28. array of pointers as function parameter
  29. What is the proper way to return an object from a C++ function?
  30. Can I call memcpy() and memmove() with “number of bytes” set to zero?

Leave a Comment