Why sizeof int is wrong, while sizeof(int) is right?

by

The following could be ambiguous:

sizeof int * + 1

Is that (sizeof (int*)) + 1, or (sizeof(int)) * (+1)?

Obviously the C language could have introduced a rule to resolve the ambiguity, but I can imagine why it didn’t bother. With the language as it stands, a type specifier never appears “naked” in an expression, and so there is no need for rules to resolve whether that second * is part of the type or an arithmetic operator.

The existing grammar does already resolve the potential ambiguity of sizeof (int *) + 1. It is (sizeof(int*))+1, not sizeof((int*)(+1)).

C++ has a somewhat similar issue to resolve with function-style cast syntax. You can write int(0) and you can write typedef int *intptr; intptr(0);, but you can’t write int*(0). In that case, the resolution is that the “naked” type must be a simple type name, it can’t just be any old type id that might have spaces in it, or trailing punctuation. Maybe sizeof could have been defined with the same restriction, I’m not certain.

More Related Contents:

  1. sizeof works unusual at c++ after array creation [duplicate]
  2. Why is the result of sizeof implementation defined? [closed]
  3. Why isn’t sizeof for a struct equal to the sum of sizeof of each member?
  4. When a function has a specific-size array parameter, why is it replaced with a pointer?
  5. Why are C character literals ints instead of chars?
  6. Is the sizeof(some pointer) always equal to four?
  7. What is the size of a pointer?
  8. Sizeof string literal
  9. How does this “size of array” template function work? [duplicate]
  10. What is the size of void?
  11. Why is the size of an empty class in C++ not zero? [duplicate]
  12. Is sizeof in C++ evaluated at compilation time or run time?
  13. How do sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]) work?
  14. sizeof() a vector
  15. Does not evaluating the expression to which sizeof is applied make it legal to dereference a null or invalid pointer inside sizeof in C++?
  16. Can sizeof return 0 (zero)
  17. Is the size of a struct required to be an exact multiple of the alignment of that struct?
  18. Why the sizeof(bool) is not defined to be one, by the Standard itself?
  19. 3-byte int and 5-byte long?
  20. Why sizeof(int) is not greater than -1? [duplicate]
  21. sizeof class with int , function, virtual function in C++?
  22. What does sizeof do?
  23. Using sizeof on arrays passed as parameters [duplicate]
  24. Why is −1 > sizeof(int)?
  25. c++ sizeof(array) return twice the array’s declared length
  26. sizeof(struct) returns unexpected value
  27. Can you resize a C++ array after initialization? [duplicate]
  28. c++ sizeof() of a class with functions
  29. How does sizeof know the size of the operand array?
  30. how to determine sizeof class with virtual functions?

Leave a Comment