Are data members allocated in the same memory space as their objects in C++?

by 
Test a;
Test *t = new Test;

a, and all its members, are on the stack.

The object pointed to by t, and all its members, are on the heap.

The pointer t is on the stack.

More Related Contents:

  1. Why should C++ programmers minimize use of ‘new’?
  2. What uses are there for “placement new”?
  3. In what cases do I use malloc and/or new?
  4. delete vs delete[] operators in C++
  5. Is it safe to delete a NULL pointer?
  6. Dynamically allocating an array of objects
  7. Operator new initializes memory to zero
  8. Compelling examples of custom C++ allocators?
  9. C++, Free-Store vs Heap
  10. Any reason to overload global new and delete?
  11. How to get memory usage under Windows in C++
  12. Are memory leaks “undefined behavior” class problem in C++?
  13. Allocating more memory than there exists using malloc
  14. How can I get the size of a memory block allocated using malloc()? [duplicate]
  15. Is it possible to delete a non-new object?
  16. std::vector and contiguous memory of multidimensional arrays
  17. Pointer-to-pointer dynamic two-dimensional array
  18. Can I pass std::string to a DLL?
  19. Check if a pointer points to allocated memory on the heap
  20. Reason why not to have a DELETE macro for C++
  21. Is it safe to realloc memory allocated with new?
  22. Why, really, deleting an incomplete type is undefined behaviour?
  23. What do I need to do before deleting elements in a vector of pointers to dynamically allocated objects?
  24. How to alloc a executable memory buffer?
  25. How does delete work? [duplicate]
  26. “Right” way to deallocate an std::vector object
  27. The difference between delete and delete[] in C++ [duplicate]
  28. Class members and explicit stack/heap allocation
  29. Why do we even need the “delete[]” operator?
  30. Should objects delete themselves in C++?

Leave a Comment