No, you’ll have to use “traditional” property definitions for custom behavior.
More Related Contents:
- What are Automatic Properties in C# and what is their purpose?
- How to get the list of properties of a class?
- Set object property using reflection
- Public Fields versus Automatic Properties
- C# 3.0 auto-properties — useful or not? [closed]
- Difference between Property and Field in C# 3.0+
- Should I use public properties and private fields or public fields for data?
- Raise an event whenever a property’s value changed?
- Making a generic property
- How to check whether an object has certain method/property?
- Why is it impossible to override a getter-only property and add a setter? [closed]
- How do I automatically display all properties of a class and their values in a string? [duplicate]
- Is the C# compiler smart enough to optimize this code?
- How to access property of anonymous type in C#?
- Enumerating through an object’s properties (string) in C#
- C# automatic property deserialization of JSON
- .NET DefaultValue attribute
- Why we need Properties in C#
- Best practices: throwing exceptions from properties
- How to find out if a property is an auto-implemented property with reflection?
- Overloading getter and setter causes a stack overflow in C# [duplicate]
- Automatically implemented property in struct can not be assigned
- How Can I add properties to a class on runtime in C#?
- Checking for null before ToString()
- Thread Safe Properties in C#
- Properties.Settings.Default.Save(); -> Where is that file
- What is the best practice for using public fields?
- How to set value of property where there is no setter
- Why use try {} finally {} with an empty try block?
- Finding property differences between two C# objects