C++ static initialization order

by

You have answered your own question. Static initialization order is undefined, and the most elegant way around it (while still doing static initialization i.e. not refactoring it away completely) is to wrap the initialization in a function.

Read the C++ FAQ items starting from https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/ctors#static-init-order

More Related Contents:

  1. Finding C++ static initialization order problems
  2. static initialization order fiasco
  3. Superiority of unnamed namespace over static?
  4. C++ static member variable and its initialization
  5. Prevent static initialization order “fiasco”, C++
  6. C++: Construction and initialization order guarantees
  7. What makes a static variable initialize only once?
  8. Is this self initialization valid?
  9. Is segmentation fault actual undefined behavior when we refer to a non-static data-member
  10. C++ Matrix Class
  11. Is a string literal in С++ created in static memory?
  12. Code outside functions
  13. Purpose of Header guards
  14. Dividing two integers to produce a float result [duplicate]
  15. How to write a type trait `is_container` or `is_vector`?
  16. What is the difference between “new” and “malloc” and “calloc” in C++? [duplicate]
  17. Get DLL path at runtime
  18. Meaning of U suffix
  19. Compile-time assertion?
  20. How to get a Windows symbol server set up
  21. Can we see the template instantiated code by C++ compiler
  22. static vs non-static variables in namespace
  23. How is vector implemented in C++
  24. Pros and cons of using nested C++ classes and enumerations?
  25. C++ : friend declaration ‘declares a non-template function
  26. C++/C function pointers that return void*
  27. How does #include work in C++?
  28. Difference between const. pointer and reference?
  29. C++11 operator”” with double parameter
  30. non-const pointer argument to a const double pointer parameter

Leave a Comment