C++ static member variable and its initialization

by

Fundamentally this is because static members must be defined in exactly one translation unit, in order to not violate the One-Definition Rule. If the language were to allow something like:

struct Gizmo
{
  static string name = "Foo";
};

then name would be defined in each translation unit that #includes this header file.

C++ does allow you to define integral static members within the declaration, but you still have to include a definition within a single translation unit, but this is just a shortcut, or syntactic sugar. So, this is allowed:

struct Gizmo
{
  static const int count = 42;
};

So long as a) the expression is const integral or enumeration type, b) the expression can be evaluated at compile-time, and c) there is still a definition somewhere that doesn’t violate the one definition rule:

file: gizmo.cpp

#include "gizmo.h"

const int Gizmo::count;

More Related Contents:

  1. C++ cannot initialize static data member [duplicate]
  2. Do the parentheses after the type name make a difference with new?
  3. How to initialize private static members in C++?
  4. Why is list initialization (using curly braces) better than the alternatives?
  5. What is the easiest way to initialize a std::vector with hardcoded elements?
  6. Initialization of all elements of an array to one default value in C++?
  7. Array[n] vs Array[10] – Initializing array with variable vs numeric literal
  8. Finding C++ static initialization order problems
  9. Uninitialized variable behaviour in C++
  10. static initialization order fiasco
  11. If a function returns no value, with a valid return type, is it okay to for the compiler to return garbage?
  12. When are static C++ class members initialized?
  13. How to initialise memory with new operator in C++?
  14. initialize a const array in a class initializer in C++
  15. Why is initialization of a new variable by itself valid? [duplicate]
  16. C++11: Correct std::array initialization?
  17. Now that we have std::array what uses are left for C-style arrays?
  18. C++: Where to initialize variables in constructor [duplicate]
  19. How can I make `new[]` default-initialize the array of primitive types?
  20. How to do the equivalent of memset(this, …) without clobbering the vtbl?
  21. How are local and global variables initialized by default?
  22. initialization: parenthesis vs. equals sign [duplicate]
  23. Different ways of initializing an object in c++
  24. What’s the difference between parentheses and braces in c++ when constructing objects
  25. How could comma separated initialization such as in Eigen be possibly implemented in C++?
  26. Fun with uninitialized variables and compiler (GCC)
  27. Is uninitialized data behavior well specified?
  28. C++ function called without object initialization
  29. What’s the motivation behind having copy and direct initialization behave differently?
  30. C++ – value of uninitialized vector

Leave a Comment