Dereferencing an invalid pointer, then taking the address of the result

by

According to the specification, the effect of dereferencing an invalid pointer itself produces undefined behaviour. It doesn’t matter what you do after dereferencing it.

More Related Contents:

  1. C++ pointer decleration
  2. What is a smart pointer and when should I use one?
  3. C++ delete – It deletes my objects but I can still access the data?
  4. Why doesn’t polymorphism work without pointers/references?
  5. C/C++: Pointer Arithmetic
  6. What is the point of function pointers?
  7. How does delete[] know it’s an array?
  8. Why is ‘this’ a pointer and not a reference?
  9. Pointers, smart pointers or shared pointers? [duplicate]
  10. What makes more sense – char* string or char *string? [duplicate]
  11. Modifying a const through a non-const pointer
  12. Why does streaming a char pointer to cout not print an address?
  13. When should I use raw pointers over smart pointers?
  14. Deleting a pointer in C++
  15. Should I store entire objects, or pointers to objects in containers?
  16. error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ‘int&’ from an rvalue of type ‘int’
  17. C++ correct way to return pointer to array from function
  18. Store an int in a char array?
  19. C++ typedef interpretation of const pointers
  20. Modifying a const int in C++ [duplicate]
  21. Difference between using character pointers and character arrays
  22. Function pointer as parameter
  23. Are non dereferenced iterators past the “one past-the-end” iterator of an array undefined behavior?
  24. How do I create an array of pointers?
  25. Const variable changed with pointer in C
  26. What does ‘**’ mean in C?
  27. Assign a string literal to a char* [duplicate]
  28. Can I call memcpy() and memmove() with “number of bytes” set to zero?
  29. Displaying the address of a string
  30. Both asterisk and ampersand in a parameter

Leave a Comment