Simple Answer: Technically No.
Long Answer:
No. But!
The syntax you use to initialize them makes them look like they are being constructed by a default constructor or a default copy constructor.
int x0(5); // Looks like a constructor. Behaves like one: x is initialized.
int x1{5};
int y0(); // Fail. Actually a function declaration.
// BUT
int y1{}; // So new syntax to allow for zero initialization
int z0 = int();// Looks like a constructor. Behaves like a constructor (0 init).
int z1 = int{};
int a0(b); // Again.
int a1{b};
So technically there are no constructors for basic-POD types. But for all intents and purposes they act just like they have a copy constructor and default constructor (when initialized with the braces).
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then its very duck like.