What is the order of evaluation in a member initializer list?

by

It depends on the order of data member declarations in the class. So a_ will be the first one, then b_ will be the second one in your example.

More Related Contents:

  1. Do the parentheses after the type name make a difference with new?
  2. What does the explicit keyword mean?
  3. What is this weird colon-member (” : “) syntax in the constructor?
  4. Default constructor with empty brackets
  5. What do the following phrases mean in C++: zero-, default- and value-initialization?
  6. Inheriting constructors
  7. Does the default constructor initialize built-in types?
  8. Constructor initialization-list evaluation order
  9. Dual emission of constructor symbols
  10. Why do I see strange values when I print uninitialized variables?
  11. Why are my struct’s members not properly initialised using `{}`? [duplicate]
  12. Are function static variables thread-safe in GCC?
  13. gcc/g++: “No such file or directory”
  14. C++: When (and how) are C++ Global Static Constructors Called?
  15. C++: Where to initialize variables in constructor [duplicate]
  16. Has the new C++11 member initialization feature at declaration made initialization lists obsolete?
  17. Different ways of initializing an object in c++
  18. Why must const members be initialized in the constructor initializer rather than in its body?
  19. Is there a way to make a C++ struct value-initialize all POD member variables?
  20. What’s the difference between Radio r = Radio(“PSR”, 100.8) and Radio(“PSR”, 100.8)?
  21. Fun with uninitialized variables and compiler (GCC)
  22. Why should I prefer to use member initializer lists?
  23. C++ Member Initializer List
  24. How do I initialize a const data member?
  25. Why does integer overflow on x86 with GCC cause an infinite loop?
  26. Does const mean thread-safe in C++11?
  27. What are primitive types default-initialized to in C++?
  28. How to write C++ getters and setters
  29. Select class constructor using enable_if
  30. Calling a virtual function from the constructor

Leave a Comment