Do nullable columns occupy additional space in PostgreSQL?

Basically, NULL values occupy 1 bit in the NULL bitmap. But it’s not that simple.

The null bitmap (per row) is only allocated if at least one column in that row holds a NULL value. This can lead to a seemingly paradoxic effect in tables with 9 or more columns: assigning the first NULL value to a column can take up more space on disk than writing a value to it. Conversely, removing the last NULL value from the row also removes the NULL bitmap.

Physically, the initial null bitmap occupies 1 byte between the HeapTupleHeader (23 bytes) and actual column data or the row OID (if you should still be using that) – which always start at a multiple of MAXALIGN (typically 8 bytes). This leaves 1 byte of padding that is utilized by the initial null bitmap.

In effect, NULL storage is absolutely free for tables of 8 columns or less (including dropped, but not yet purged columns).
After that, another MAXALIGN bytes (typically 8) are allocated for the next MAXALIGN * 8 columns (typically 64). Etc.

More details in the manual and under these related questions:

Once you understand alignment padding of data types, you can further optimize storage:

But the cases are rare where you can save substantial amounts of space. Normally it’s not worth the effort.

@Daniel already covers effects on index size.

Note that dropped columns (though now invisible) are kept in the system catalogs until the table is recreated. Those zombis can force the allocation of an (enlarged) NULL bitmap. See:

Leave a Comment