Why rand is a bad idea
Most of the answers you got here make use of the rand function and the modulus operator. That method may not generate numbers uniformly (it depends on the range and the value of RAND_MAX), and is therefore discouraged.
C++11 and generation over a range
With C++11 multiple other options have risen. One of which fits your requirements, for generating a random number in a range, pretty nicely: std::uniform_int_distribution. Here’s an example:
const int range_from = 0;
const int range_to = 10;
std::random_device rand_dev;
std::mt19937 generator(rand_dev());
std::uniform_int_distribution<int> distr(range_from, range_to);
std::cout << distr(generator) << '\n';
And here‘s the running example.
Template function may help some:
template<typename T>
T random(T range_from, T range_to) {
std::random_device rand_dev;
std::mt19937 generator(rand_dev());
std::uniform_int_distribution<T> distr(range_from, range_to);
return distr(generator);
}
Other random generators
The <random> header offers innumerable other random number generators with different kind of distributions including Bernoulli, Poisson and normal.
How can I shuffle a container?
The standard provides std::shuffle, which can be used as follows:
std::vector<int> vec = {4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42};
std::random_device random_dev;
std::mt19937 generator(random_dev());
std::shuffle(vec.begin(), vec.end(), generator);
The algorithm will reorder the elements randomly, with a linear complexity.
Boost.Random
Another alternative, in case you don’t have access to a C++11+ compiler, is to use Boost.Random. Its interface is very similar to the C++11 one.