Must the int main() function return a value in all compilers? [duplicate]

by

In C++, and in C99 and C11, it is a special rule of the language that if the control flow reaches the end of the main function, then the function impliclty returns 0.

More Related Contents:

  1. Why should I not #include ?
  2. Why doesn’t a simple “Hello World”-style program compile with Turbo C++?
  3. Mouse program in Turbo CPP
  4. positioning pie slice problems
  5. Pass by Reference / Value in C++
  6. std::vector::resize() vs. std::vector::reserve()
  7. Difference between files written in binary and text mode
  8. How to call C++ function from C?
  9. Why does stringstream >> change value of target on failure?
  10. Is null reference possible?
  11. Why does printf() promote a float to a double?
  12. C++ Static member method call on class instance
  13. Cannot convert parameter from ‘const char[20]’ to ‘LPCWSTR’
  14. Nonfree module is missing in OpenCV 3.0
  15. C++ Error: undefined reference to `main’
  16. How to filter items from a std::map? [duplicate]
  17. Is the use of std::vector objects in C++ acceptable, or should I use an alternative?
  18. What are the differences between overriding virtual functions and hiding non-virtual functions?
  19. When including header files, is the path case sensitive?
  20. Heap Corruption while using CreateWindowExW
  21. App does not run with VS 2008 SP1 DLLs, previous version works with RTM versions
  22. How to get a color palette from an image using OpenCV [closed]
  23. Behaviour of malloc with delete in C++
  24. Can branches with undefined behavior be assumed unreachable and optimized as dead code?
  25. How to set ROI in OpenCV?
  26. What happens before main in C++?
  27. What are the differences between std::variant and boost::variant?
  28. How is a bool represented in memory?
  29. No == operator found while comparing structs in C++
  30. Differences of using “const cv::Mat &”, “cv::Mat &”, “cv::Mat” or “const cv::Mat” as function parameters?

Leave a Comment