One VS2010 bug ? Allowing binding non-const reference to rvalue WITHOUT EVEN a warning?

by

That is a known issue/feature of the VS compilers. They have always allowed that and there does not seem to be any push into removing that extension.

More Related Contents:

  1. Rvalue Reference is Treated as an Lvalue?
  2. Return type of ‘?:’ (ternary conditional operator)
  3. On how to recognize Rvalue or Lvalue reference and if-it-has-a-name rule
  4. what is return type of assignment operator?
  5. Is it valid to bind non-const lvalue-references to rvalues in C++ 11?(modified)
  6. Why is taking the address of a temporary illegal?
  7. How to determine programmatically if an expression is rvalue or lvalue in C++?
  8. Why does std::forward have two overloads?
  9. prolonging the lifetime of temporaries
  10. Why does an lvalue cast work?
  11. Why are arrays of references illegal?
  12. difference between a pointer and reference parameter?
  13. Why is template argument deduction disabled with std::forward?
  14. How to compile Qt 5 under Windows or Linux, 32 or 64 bit, static or dynamic on Visual Studio or g++
  15. Function pointer vs Function reference
  16. How can I change the variable to which a C++ reference refers?
  17. How to create a DLL with SWIG from Visual Studio 2010
  18. Why can’t I do polymorphism with normal variables?
  19. What is the difference between a const reference and normal parameter?
  20. Passing rvalues through std::bind
  21. Difference between const. pointer and reference?
  22. error C2065: ‘cout’ : undeclared identifier
  23. Can we get the type of a lambda argument?
  24. Where ampersand “&” can be put when passing argument by reference?
  25. STL map containing references does not compile
  26. C++ static variable in .lib does not initialize
  27. Using data member in lambda capture list inside a member function
  28. What does it mean to return a reference?
  29. Meaning of *& and **& in C++
  30. Is returning references of member variables bad practice?

Leave a Comment