- Unspecified in the standard.
- Yes, but this means that the key is destroyed after its associated value.
More Related Contents:
- how portable is end iterator decrement?
- stl::map assert [closed]
- How can I use std::maps with user-defined types as key?
- Is std::vector so much slower than plain arrays?
- How do I erase an element from std::vector by index?
- How to find if a given key exists in a C++ std::map
- How to get std::vector pointer to the raw data?
- Can standard container templates be instantiated with incomplete types?
- Sort list using STL sort function
- What does the standard library guarantee about self move assignment?
- Why use functors over functions?
- How to declare a vector of atomic in C++
- std::optional specialization for reference types
- How to iterate over a priority_queue?
- How does std::copy work with stream iterators
- Can we use a user defined class for the key in a STL map?
- Performance of qsort vs std::sort?
- How does C++ STL unordered_map resolve collisions?
- How do I erase elements from STL containers?
- What happens when you call data() on a std::vector?
- STL analogue in Fortran
- How to use the priority queue STL for objects?
- std::vector reserve() and push_back() is faster than resize() and array index, why?
- std::mutex performance compared to win32 CRITICAL_SECTION
- Vector Iterators Incompatible
- Should you overload swap in the std namespace?
- C++ Class wrapper around fundamental types
- Why can’t I replace std::map with std::unordered_map
- C++ template function compiles in header but not implementation
- Insert into an STL queue using std::copy