Not the way you want; policies are designed to be cumulative. For example if you use two separate attributes then they must both pass. You have to evaluate OR conditions within a single policy. But you don’t have to code it as ORs within a single handler. You can have a requirement which has more … Read more
That seems you want to use claims-based authorization via policies . After setting windows authentication in your application , you could add custom claim to ClaimsPrincipal ,check user’s identity and confirm which permission current user has : You can add a claims transformation service to your application: class ClaimsTransformer : IClaimsTransformation { public Task<ClaimsPrincipal> TransformAsync(ClaimsPrincipal … Read more
These are ClaimTypes, which represents the pre-defined types of claims that an entity can claim. The ones you mention are from WIF, here are the IdentityModel ClaimTypes. Known claimtypes are automatically deserialized into the context. Like http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2008/06/identity/claims/role is added as role to the user.roles collection (used for IsInRole). So the types are not random, but … Read more
Yes. The example you showed is very close to many of the Microsoft provided samples for using Route Constraints. The routing engine acts as a pre-proxy (or router if you will) before the request is passed into a control. Items like IRouteConstraint are defined so you can do just what you described.
I had similar situation. Here is what I did: Try to check and uncheck the USB Debugging option in the device. (if not working, try to unplug/plug the USB) At some point, the device should show up a messagebox to ask you if you authorize the computer. After you click yes, the device is then … Read more
curl -u username:password http:// curl -u username http:// From the documentation page: -u, –user <user:password> Specify the user name and password to use for server authentication. Overrides -n, –netrc and –netrc-optional. If you simply specify the user name, curl will prompt for a password. The user name and passwords are split up on the first … Read more
My CustomAuthorizationPolicy.Evaluate() method never fires
We didn’t need to pass all the attribute as auth, retrofit itself handle this, we need to pass only the CONSUMER_KEY, CONSUMER_SECRET, ACCESS_TOKEN and TOKEN_SECRET. By following this ApiUtils class will be like, Kotlin class ApiUtils { companion object { fun getAPIService(): APIService? { val consumer = OkHttpOAuthConsumer(BuildConfig.CONSUMER_KEY, BuildConfig.CONSUMER_SECRET) consumer.setTokenWithSecret(BuildConfig.ACCESS_TOKEN, BuildConfig.TOKEN_SECRET) return RetrofitClient.getClient(BuildConfig.BASE_URL, consumer)?.create(APIService::class.java) } … Read more
Let me clarify a little @Adem’s answer. You need to to implement custom middleware in specific way. There is 3 abstract classes that need to be implemented to implementing this (answer is correct for asp.net core rc2btw): Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder.AuthenticationOptions Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationMiddleware<TOptions> Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationHandler<TOptions> and then add this middleware to your startup class. Code example: public class TokenOptions : … Read more
Add the following text to your authz specifying a user by name for path-based authorization (<reponame> can be the name of any repository). [<reponame>:/branches/calc/bug-142/secret] harry = To give Harry readonly access to the secret folder then do the following. [<reponame>:/branches/calc/bug-142/secret] harry = r These will specifically deny a user from having any less restrictive inherited … Read more