Template within template: why “`>>’ should be `> >’ within a nested template argument list”

by

Sometimes you want it to be >>. Consider

boost::array<int, 1024>>2> x;

In C++03 this successfully parses and creates an array of size 256.

More Related Contents:

  1. How to cin values into a vector
  2. How can I declare a member vector of the same class?
  3. Template instantiation details of GCC and MS compilers
  4. C++ template function compiles in header but not implementation
  5. What is a vector of vector of point? [closed]
  6. Difference of keywords ‘typename’ and ‘class’ in templates?
  7. Is std::vector so much slower than plain arrays?
  8. C++ templates that accept only certain types
  9. How do I erase an element from std::vector by index?
  10. how does array[100] = {0} set the entire array to 0?
  11. How to change mode from c++98 mode in Dev-C++ to a mode that supports C++0x (range based for)?
  12. How to get std::vector pointer to the raw data?
  13. Vector of Vectors to create matrix
  14. How to initialize std::array elegantly if T is not default constructible?
  15. Template tuple – calling a function on each element
  16. Nested templates with dependent scope
  17. Limiting range of value types in C++
  18. Deducing first template argument with other template parameters defaulted
  19. Cleaning up an STL list/vector of pointers
  20. How to read / write a struct in Binary Files?
  21. C++ parameter pack, constrained to have instances of a single type?
  22. Two phase name lookup for C++ templates – Why?
  23. Optimization of raw new[]/delete[] vs std::vector
  24. How can I expand call to variadic template base classes?
  25. What should std::vector::data() return if the vector is empty?
  26. Template Metaprogramming – Difference Between Using Enum Hack and Static Const
  27. Vector Iterators Incompatible
  28. How to check if a template parameter is an iterator type or not?
  29. Will I be able to declare a constexpr lambda inside a template parameter?
  30. C++ template function default value

Leave a Comment