Understanding Fragment’s setRetainInstance(boolean)

First of all, check out my post on retained Fragments. It might help.

Now to answer your questions:

Does the fragment also retain its view state, or will this be recreated on configuration change – what exactly is “retained”?

Yes, the Fragment‘s state will be retained across the configuration change. Specifically, “retained” means that the fragment will not be destroyed on configuration changes. That is, the Fragment will be retained even if the configuration change causes the underlying Activity to be destroyed.

Will the fragment be destroyed when the user leaves the activity?

Just like Activitys, Fragments may be destroyed by the system when memory resources are low. Whether you have your fragments retain their instance state across configuration changes will have no effect on whether or not the system will destroy the Fragments once you leave the Activity. If you leave the Activity (i.e. by pressing the home button), the Fragments may or may not be destroyed. If you leave the Activity by pressing the back button (thus, calling finish() and effectively destroying the Activity), all of the Activitys attached Fragments will also be destroyed.

Why doesn’t it work with fragments on the back stack?

There are probably multiple reasons why it’s not supported, but the most obvious reason to me is that the Activity holds a reference to the FragmentManager, and the FragmentManager manages the backstack. That is, no matter if you choose to retain your Fragments or not, the Activity (and thus the FragmentManager‘s backstack) will be destroyed on a configuration change. Another reason why it might not work is because things might get tricky if both retained fragments and non-retained fragments were allowed to exist on the same backstack.

Which are the use cases where it makes sense to use this method?

Retained fragments can be quite useful for propagating state information — especially thread management — across activity instances. For example, a fragment can serve as a host for an instance of Thread or AsyncTask, managing its operation. See my blog post on this topic for more information.

In general, I would treat it similarly to using onConfigurationChanged with an Activity… don’t use it as a bandaid just because you are too lazy to implement/handle an orientation change correctly. Only use it when you need to.

Leave a Comment