The order of local variable on the stack is unspecified.
It may change between different compilers, different versions or different optimization options. It may even depend on the names of the variables or other seemingly unrelated things.
More Related Contents:
- Order of local variable allocation on the stack
- Stack allocation, padding, and alignment
- When and how to use GCC’s stack protection feature?
- Why does the compiler allocate more than needed in the stack?
- How to place a variable at a given absolute address in memory (with GCC)
- How to clear input buffer in C?
- Is there a 128 bit integer in gcc?
- How to turn on (literally) ALL of GCC’s warnings?
- Checking available stack size in C
- experimental::filesystem linker error
- How does GCC implement variable-length arrays?
- How to recompile with -fPIC
- C++ compilation bug?
- Where is PATH_MAX defined in Linux?
- Labels in GCC inline assembly
- Is auto as a parameter in a regular function a GCC 4.9 extension?
- endl and flushing the buffer
- Recommended gcc warning options for C [closed]
- 😃 (and other Unicode characters) in identifiers not allowed by g++
- Build .so file from .c file using gcc command line
- Inherit interfaces which share a method name
- Compile a DLL in C/C++, then call it from another program
- Preventing compiler optimizations while benchmarking
- Linking to MSVC DLL from MinGW
- Determine variable names dynamically according to a string in Fortran
- Why do I get different results when I dereference a pointer after freeing it?
- How to generate random variable names in C++ using macros?
- dyld: Library not loaded: ….. How to correctly tell GCC Compiler where to find another static library?
- Returning struct containing array
- Why does malloc allocate a different number of bytes than requested?