Why did Microsoft abandon long double data type? [closed]

by

I’m not sure why you think that long double was “abandoned”, as it is part of the C++ Standard and therefore a compliant implementation must, well, implement it.

What they did “abandon” is long double overloads of mathematical functions, and they did this because:

In Win32 programming, however, the long double data type maps to the double, 64-bit precision data type.

which, in turn, along with long double in older VS versions being 80-bit, is because:

FP code generation has been switching to the use of SSE/SSE2/SSE3 instruction sets instead of the x87 FP stack since that is what both the AMD and Intel recent and future chip generations are focusing their performance efforts on. These instruction sets only support 32 and 64 bit FP formats.

Still, that they chose not to support these overloads, even with same-sized double and long double types (both could have been made 64-bit), is a shame because they are also part of the C++ Standard. But, well, that’s Microsoft for you. Intently stubborn.

[n3290: 26.8]: In addition to the double versions of the math
functions in <cmath>, C++ adds float and long double overloaded
versions of these functions, with the same semantics.

However, although these overloads are essentially deprecated in Visual Studio, they are still available, so you should still be able to use them:

The Microsoft run-time library provides long double versions of the
math functions only for backward compatibility.

Is there any alternative to use? (I would also be happy with an alternative out of the boost library).

It sounds to me like you have been relying on long double to support a specific range of numeric values, and have consequently run into regression issues when that has changed in a different toolchain.

If you have a specific numeric range requirement, use fixed-range integral types. Here you have a few options:

  • stdint.h – a C99 feature that some C++ toolchains support as an extension;
  • stdint.h – a C99 feature that Boost re-implements as a library;
  • cstdint – a C++0x feature that may be of use if you are writing C++0x code.

More Related Contents:

  1. Integer division always zero [duplicate]
  2. long double vs double
  3. Why does changing 0.1f to 0 slow down performance by 10x?
  4. Setup OpenCV-2.3 for Visual Studio 2010
  5. How do I make a fully statically linked .exe with Visual Studio Express 2005?
  6. error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _WinMain@16 referenced in function ___tmainCRTStartup
  7. What are some reasons a Release build would run differently than a Debug build [closed]
  8. Exporting classes containing `std::` objects (vector, map etc.) from a DLL
  9. Why does printf() promote a float to a double?
  10. Automatically stop Visual C++ 2008 build at first compile error?
  11. double or float, which is faster? [duplicate]
  12. Floating point equality and tolerances
  13. What is “pch.h” and why is it needed to be included as the first header file?
  14. Microsoft Visual Studio ~ C/C++ Runtime Library ~ Static/dynamic linking
  15. “The system cannot find the file specified” when running C++ program
  16. visual c++: #include files from other projects in the same solution
  17. How to avoid precompiled headers
  18. Compare two float variables in C++
  19. A fast method to round a double to a 32-bit int explained
  20. Assertion failed (size.width>0 && size.height>0)
  21. Using CMake to generate Visual Studio C++ project files
  22. Stopping the debugger when a NaN floating point number is produced
  23. Template instantiation details of GCC and MS compilers
  24. Cast to int vs floor
  25. Errors when linking to protobuf 3 on MS Visual C
  26. trying to use VideoCapture and imshow(), raises Assertion failed (size.width>0 && size.height>0) in cv::imshow
  27. Locally disable padding
  28. How to load a custom binary resource in a VC++ static library as part of a dll?
  29. VS: unexpected optimization behavior with _BitScanReverse64 intrinsic
  30. Does the C++ standard specify anything on the representation of floating point numbers?

Leave a Comment