Why does HashMap require that the initial capacity be a power of two?

The map has to work out which internal table index to use for any given key, mapping any int value (could be negative) to a value in the range [0, table.length). When table.length is a power of two, that can be done really cheaply – and is, in indexFor:

static int indexFor(int h, int length) {
    return h & (length-1);
}

With a different table length, you’d need to compute a remainder and make sure it’s non-negative . This is definitely a micro-optimization, but probably a valid one 🙂

Also, when automatic rehashing is performed, what exactly happens? Is the hash function altered too?

It’s not quite clear to me what you mean. The same hash codes are used (because they’re just computed by calling hashCode on each key) but they’ll be distributed differently within the table due to the table length changing. For example, when the table length is 16, hash codes of 5 and 21 both end up being stored in table entry 5. When the table length increases to 32, they will be in different entries.

Leave a Comment