Within each category of storage classes (except dynamically allocated objects), objects are destructed in the reverse order of construction.
More Related Contents:
- Is a Union Member’s Destructor Called
- Why does destructor disable generation of implicit move methods?
- C++ Runtime Terminates std::out_of_range [closed]
- Is it possible to print a variable’s type in standard C++?
- What does T&& (double ampersand) mean in C++11?
- What is std::move(), and when should it be used?
- Variadic template pack expansion
- How does #include work in C++? [duplicate]
- Is it a conforming compiler extension to treat non-constexpr standard library functions as constexpr?
- How does std::forward work? [duplicate]
- Why is the destructor of a future returned from `std::async` blocking?
- C++11 “auto” semantics
- order of evaluation of operands
- When is overloading pass by reference (l-value and r-value) preferred to pass-by-value?
- Matching alias template as template argument
- Does the GotW #101 “solution” actually solve anything?
- Does static constexpr variable inside a function make sense?
- Destructors of builtin types (int, char etc..)
- Can we return objects having a deleted/private copy/move constructor by value from a function?
- Is there any compiler barrier which is equal to asm(“” ::: “memory”) in C++11?
- std::unique_ptr for C functions that need free
- C++11 “overloaded lambda” with variadic template and variable capture
- How can I use Standard Library (STL) classes in my dll interface or ABI?
- Why does pointer to int convert to void* but pointer to function convert to bool?
- boost::asio + std::future – Access violation after closing socket
- Should all/most setter functions in C++11 be written as function templates accepting universal references?
- C++11 random numbers
- Is the whole object freed with a non-virtual destructor and a Base class pointer?
- enum vs constexpr for actual static constants inside classes
- Is there a standard way of moving a range into a vector?