C++0x lambda capture by value always const?

by

Use mutable.


auto bar = [=] () mutable -> bool ....

Without mutable you are declaring the operator () of the lambda object const.

More Related Contents:

  1. Declaring lambda with int type not working [closed]
  2. C++ lambda with captures as a function pointer
  3. Move capture in lambda
  4. Passing capturing lambda as function pointer
  5. const vs constexpr on variables
  6. Does const mean thread-safe in C++11?
  7. What is the type of lambda when deduced with “auto” in C++11?
  8. How is std::function implemented?
  9. Why can lambdas be better optimized by the compiler than plain functions?
  10. Bind Vs Lambda?
  11. const& , & and && specifiers for member functions in C++
  12. C++11 lambda implementation and memory model
  13. Can lambda functions be templated?
  14. Error: variable “cannot be implicitly captured because no default capture mode has been specified”
  15. Lambda capture and parameter with same name – who shadows the other? (clang vs gcc)
  16. why do lambda functions in c++11 not have function types?
  17. Why can’t I create a vector of lambdas (of the same type) in C++11?
  18. Why can’t I capture this by-reference (‘&this’) in lambda?
  19. Lambda expressions as class template parameters
  20. How to immediately invoke a C++ lambda?
  21. constexpr vs. static const: Which one to prefer?
  22. Do c++11 lambdas capture variables they don’t use?
  23. How do static variables in lambda function objects work?
  24. Should I still return const objects in C++11? [duplicate]
  25. Lambdas and capture by reference local variables : Accessing after the scope
  26. Passing a lambda into a function template
  27. What is the purpose of std::function and how to use it?
  28. In lambda functions syntax, what purpose does a ‘capture list’ serve?
  29. Lambdas and std::function
  30. Explicit Return Type of Lambda

Leave a Comment