It seems to me very dangerous to use \d
, It is a poor design decision in the language, as in most cases you want [0-9]
. Huffman-coding would dictate the use of \d
for ASCII numbers.
Most of the previous posters have already highlighted why you should use [0-9]
, so let me give you a bit more data:
-
If I read the unicode charts correctly ‘
۷۰
‘ is a number (70 in indic, don’t take my word for it). -
Try this:
$ perl -le '$one = chr 0xFF11; print "$one + 1 = ", $one+1;' 1 + 1 = 1
-
Here is a partial list of valid numbers (which may or may not show up properly in your browser, depending on the fonts you use), for each number, only the first of those being interpreted as a number when doing arithmetics with Perl, as shown above:
ZERO: 0٠۰߀०০੦૦୦௦౦೦൦๐໐0 ONE: 1١۱߁१১੧૧୧௧౧೧൧๑໑1 TWO: 2٢۲߂२২੨૨୨௨౨೨൨๒໒2 THREE: 3٣۳߃३৩੩૩୩௩౩೩൩๓໓3 FOUR: 4٤۴߄४৪੪૪୪௪౪೪൪๔໔4 FIVE: 5٥۵߅५৫੫૫୫௫౫೫൫๕໕5 SIX: 6٦۶߆६৬੬૬୬௬౬೬൬๖໖6 SEVEN: 7٧۷߇७৭੭૭୭௭౭೭൭๗໗7 EIGHT: 8٨۸߈८৮੮૮୮௮౮೮൮๘໘8 NINE: 9٩۹߉९৯੯૯୯௯౯೯൯๙໙9��
Are you still not convinced?