There might be an issue with Google Apps Scripts and post-ing to a URL that gives you back a redirection header. It seems like it might not be possible to follow the redirect with a post – here’s a discussion on the issue – https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/36754794 Would it be possible, if you modify your code to … Read more
You could use proxy_redirect directive: http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_proxy_module.html#proxy_redirect Nginx will still return 301/302 to the client but proxy_redirect will modify Location header and the client should make a new request to the URL given in the Location header. Something like this should make the subsequent request back to nginx: proxy_redirect http://upstream:port/ http://$http_host/;
According to this blog post: http://blog.dubbelboer.com/2012/11/25/302-cookie.html all major browsers, IE (6, 7, 8, 9, 10), FF (17), Safari (6.0.2), Opera (12.11) both on Windows and Mac, set cookies on redirects. This is true for both 301 and 302 redirects. As @Benni noted : https://www.chromium.org/administrators/policy-list-3/cookie-legacy-samesite-policies The SameSite attribute of a cookie specifies whether the cookie should … Read more
A 302 redirect means that the page was temporarily moved, while a 301 means that it was permanently moved. 301s are good for SEO value, while 302s aren’t because 301s instruct clients to forget the value of the original URL, while the 302 keeps the value of the original and can thus potentially reduce the … Read more
Forgot about middlewares in this scenario, this will do the trick: meta = {‘dont_redirect’: True,’handle_httpstatus_list’: [302]} That said, you will need to include meta parameter when you yield your request: yield Request(item[‘link’],meta = { ‘dont_redirect’: True, ‘handle_httpstatus_list’: [302] }, callback=self.your_callback)
I had the same problem in my app. You can’t really “catch” a 302 redirect response. The browser catches it before Angular get it’s hand on it. so actually, when you do receive your response – it is already too late. The bad news: it’s not a problem in the angular platform. The xmlHttpRequest do … Read more
The accepted answer does not work for the reasons given. I posted a comment with a link to a question that described a hack to get round the problem of the 302 being transparently handled by the browser: How to manage a redirect request after a jQuery Ajax call However, it is a bit of … Read more
For 4.1 version: DefaultHttpClient httpclient = new DefaultHttpClient(); httpclient.setRedirectStrategy(new DefaultRedirectStrategy() { public boolean isRedirected(HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response, HttpContext context) { boolean isRedirect=false; try { isRedirect = super.isRedirected(request, response, context); } catch (ProtocolException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } if (!isRedirect) { int responseCode = response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode(); if (responseCode == 301 || responseCode == … Read more
I don’t know about the 302, but I tested the 301 on some browsers today, here the results: SCENARIO: user clicks link on domainX that points to domainA. domainA does a 301 redirect to domainB. IE8 referer when landing on domainB is: domainX (even when using InPrivate browsing and even when user opens link in … Read more
Status 301 means that the resource (page) is moved permanently to a new location. The client/browser should not attempt to request the original location but use the new location from now on. Status 302 means that the resource is temporarily located somewhere else, and the client/browser should continue requesting the original url.