They are compiler magic, and implementation-dependent.
More Related Contents:
- What does int argc, char *argv[] mean?
- Why can’t the template argument be deduced when it is used as template parameter to another template?
- Why not infer template parameter from constructor?
- Initializing fields in constructor – initializer list vs constructor body [duplicate]
- Specifying one type for all arguments passed to variadic function or variadic template function w/out using array, vector, structs, etc?
- Why does C++ allow unnamed function parameters?
- Why is it allowed to pass R-Values by const reference but not by normal reference?
- Call a function before main [duplicate]
- Should I return EXIT_SUCCESS or 0 from main()?
- Create new C++ object at specific memory address?
- C++: Argument Passing “passed by reference”
- Is main() overloaded in C++?
- Can I use parameters for the table name in sqlite3?
- Passing array of structures to function c++
- C++ Fatal Error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
- when do we need to pass the size of array as a parameter
- What is the difference between a const reference and normal parameter?
- Standard Library Containers with additional optional template parameters?
- Can I use identical names for fields and constructor parameters?
- Why do we need to use `int main` and not `void main` in C++? [duplicate]
- Correct usage of the Eigen::Ref class
- in c++ main function is the entry point to program how i can change it to an other function?
- Why does C++ parameter scope affect function lookup within a namespace?
- Why do we need argc while there is always a null at the end of argv?
- Why does int main() {} compile?
- What does *& mean in a function parameter
- IN/OUT Parameters and how to work with them in C++
- Why calling main() is not allowed in C++
- What does it mean to return a reference?
- Differences of using “const cv::Mat &”, “cv::Mat &”, “cv::Mat” or “const cv::Mat” as function parameters?