resizes wrong; appears to have unremovable `min-width: min-content`

by

Update (25 Sept 2017)

The Firefox bug described below is fixed as of Firefox 53 and the link to this answer has finally been removed from Bootstrap’s documentation.

Also, my sincere apologies to the Mozilla contributors who had to block removing support for -moz-document partly due to this answer.

The fix

In WebKit and Firefox 53+, you just set min-width: 0; on the fieldset to override the default value of min-content.¹

Still, Firefox is a bit… odd when it comes to fieldsets. To make this work in earlier versions, you must change the display property of the fieldset to one of the following values:

  • table-cell (recommended)
  • table-column
  • table-column-group
  • table-footer-group
  • table-header-group
  • table-row
  • table-row-group

Of these, I recommend table-cell. Both table-row and table-row-group prevent you from changing width, while table-column and table-column-group prevent you from changing height.

This will (somewhat reasonably) break rendering in IE. Since only Gecko needs this, you can justifiably use @-moz-document—one of Mozilla’s proprietary CSS extensions—to hide it from other browsers:

@-moz-document url-prefix() {
    fieldset {
        display: table-cell;
    }
}

(Here’s a jsFiddle demo.)

That fixes things, but if you’re anything like me your reaction was something like…

What.

There is a reason, but it’s not pretty.

The default presentation of the fieldset element is absurd and essentially impossible to specify in CSS. Think about it: the fieldset’s border disappears where it’s overlapped by a legend element, but the background remains visible! There’s no way to reproduce this with any other combination of elements.

To top it off, implementations are full of concessions to legacy behaviour. One such is that the minimum width of a fieldset is never less than the intrinsic width of its content. WebKit gives you a way to override this behaviour by specifying it in the default stylesheet, but Gecko² goes a step further and enforces it in the rendering engine.

However, internal table elements constitute a special frame type in Gecko. Dimensional constraints for elements with these display values set are calculated in a separate code path, entirely circumventing the enforced minimum width imposed on fieldsets.

Again—the bug for this has been fixed as of Firefox 53, so you do not need this hack if you are only targeting newer versions.

Is using @-moz-document safe?

For this one issue, yes. @-moz-document works as intended in all versions of Firefox up until 53, where this bug is fixed.

This is no accident. Due in part to this answer, the bug to limit @-moz-document to user/UA stylesheets was made dependent on the underlying fieldset bug being fixed first.

Beyond this, do not use @-moz-document to target Firefox in your CSS, other resources notwithstanding.³

¹ Value may be prefixed. According to one reader, this has no effect in Android 4.1.2 Stock Browser and possibly other old versions; I have not had time to verify this.

² All links to the Gecko source in this answer refer to the 5065fdc12408 changeset, committed 29ᵗʰ July 2013; you may wish to compare notes with the most recent revision from Mozilla Central.

³ See e.g. SO #953491: Targeting only Firefox with CSS and CSS Tricks: CSS hacks targeting Firefox for widely referenced articles on high-profile sites.

More Related Contents:

  1. How can I make a div not larger than its contents?
  2. How to make an element width: 100% minus padding?
  3. How to make a div fill a remaining horizontal space?
  4. How to make div’s percentage width relative to parent div and not viewport
  5. Div width 100% minus fixed amount of pixels
  6. Width 100% with white borders around it. WHy?
  7. Make an image width 100% of parent div, but not bigger than its own width
  8. Why do s clear floats?
  9. Is it possible to achieve a -like effect without using the tag?
  10. How do browsers calculate width when child depends on parent, and parent’s depends on child’s
  11. Word wrap a link so it doesn’t overflow its parent div width [duplicate]
  12. How to center elements on the last row in CSS Grid?
  13. Is there an equivalent to background-size: cover and contain for image elements?
  14. Using margin:auto to vertically-align a div
  15. Position: absolute and parent height?
  16. Responsive CSS Trapezoid Shape
  17. How can I set the max-width of a table cell using percentages?
  18. Flex items not respecting margins and box-sizing: border-box
  19. Why cannot change checkbox color whatever I do? [duplicate]
  20. Align the form to the center in Bootstrap 4 [duplicate]
  21. CSS for changing color of last word in h1
  22. CSS box shadow around a custom shape?
  23. floating elements are outside of containing blocks?
  24. How to have two items on opposite sides on the same line
  25. body { overflow-x: hidden; } breaks position: sticky
  26. Bootstrap 3 grid, does it *really* matter how many columns are in a row?
  27. click link below a higher z-index div [duplicate]
  28. Img’s max-height not respecting parent’s dimensions
  29. backdrop-filter not working for nested elements in Chrome
  30. Fitting child into parent

Leave a Comment