Strange behavior of const_cast [duplicate]

by

Because modifying a variable declared to be const is undefined behavior, literally anything can happen.

More Related Contents:

  1. c++ push reference node to stl list
  2. How come a non-const reference cannot bind to a temporary object?
  3. Why can’t I make a vector of references?
  4. Is const_cast safe?
  5. Return type of ‘?:’ (ternary conditional operator)
  6. Is the practice of returning a C++ reference variable evil?
  7. Why are references not reseatable in C++
  8. Is there any way to find the address of a reference?
  9. C++: const reference, before vs after type-specifier
  10. how does the ampersand(&) sign work in c++? [duplicate]
  11. Difference between pointer and reference as thread parameter
  12. Difference between pointer to a reference and reference to a pointer
  13. What’s the meaning of * and & when applied to variable names?
  14. exit() call inside a function which should return a reference
  15. why reference size is always 4 bytes – c++
  16. Why does storing references (not pointers) in containers in C++ not work?
  17. Difference between returning reference vs returning value C++
  18. How can I change the variable to which a C++ reference refers?
  19. warning: returning reference to temporary
  20. Why can’t I do polymorphism with normal variables?
  21. what is return type of assignment operator?
  22. Why doesn’t reference-to-member exist in C++?
  23. Dangling references and undefined behavior
  24. C++: difference between ampersand “&” and asterisk “*” in function/method declaration?
  25. dereferencing a pointer when passing by reference
  26. Use const wherever possible in C++?
  27. Why isn’t operator overloading for pointers allowed to work?
  28. C++ strings: [] vs. *
  29. Rvalues, lvalues and formal definitions
  30. const reference to a temporary object becomes broken after function scope (life time)

Leave a Comment