Use of ‘const’ for function parameters
More Related Contents:
- How come a non-const reference cannot bind to a temporary object?
- What is the type of string literals in C and C++?
- What’s the difference between constexpr and const?
- Why isn’t it legal to convert “pointer to pointer to non-const” to a “pointer to pointer to const”
- Purpose of returning by const value? [duplicate]
- Do rvalue references to const have any use?
- How is a variable at the same address producing 2 different values? [duplicate]
- What is the meaning of a const at end of a member function? [duplicate]
- Const map element access
- What kind of optimization does const offer in C/C++?
- Deleting a pointer to const (T const*)
- Functions with const arguments and Overloading
- ‘const int’ vs. ‘int const’ as function parameters in C++ and C
- C/C++: Optimization of pointers to string constants
- Why are string literals const?
- What is the difference between const_iterator and non-const iterator in the C++ STL?
- Why would someone use #define to define constants?
- changing the value of const variable in C++ [duplicate]
- Do I really need to implement user-provided constructor for const objects?
- C++ typedef interpretation of const pointers
- Modifying a const int in C++ [duplicate]
- How does overloading of const and non-const functions work?
- Returning a const reference to an object instead of a copy
- What is the difference between a static and const variable?
- What is a constant reference? (not a reference to a constant)
- What is the difference between #define and const? [duplicate]
- Is casting std::pair const& to std::pair const& safe?
- Const variable changed with pointer in C
- Modifying reference member from const member function in C++
- prolonging the lifetime of temporaries