More Related Contents:
- When do I really need to use atomic instead of bool? [duplicate]
- Do I have to use atomic for “exit” bool variable?
- Why is integer assignment on a naturally aligned variable atomic on x86?
- Will two atomic writes to different locations in different threads always be seen in the same order by other threads?
- Why don’t compilers merge redundant std::atomic writes?
- Atomicity on x86
- What exactly is std::atomic?
- How to implement multithread safe singleton in C++11 without using
- Implementing 64 bit atomic counter with 32 bit atomics
- Mixing C++11 atomics and OpenMP
- How to declare a vector of atomic in C++
- Can a bool read/write operation be not atomic on x86? [duplicate]
- What do each memory_order mean?
- Why does a std::atomic store with sequential consistency use XCHG?
- Is there any compiler barrier which is equal to asm(“” ::: “memory”) in C++11?
- How to atomically update a maximum value?
- For purposes of ordering, is atomic read-modify-write one operation or two?
- C++ How is release-and-acquire achieved on x86 only using MOV?
- Why is the volatile qualifier used through out std::atomic?
- Why are std::atomic objects not copyable?
- C++11: the difference between memory_order_relaxed and memory_order_consume
- How do memory_order_seq_cst and memory_order_acq_rel differ?
- c++, std::atomic, what is std::memory_order and how to use them?
- Understanding std::atomic::compare_exchange_weak() in C++11
- Double-Checked Lock Singleton in C++11
- C++11 memory_order_acquire and memory_order_release semantics?
- [[carries_dependency]] what it means and how to implement
- Acquire/Release versus Sequentially Consistent memory order
- Atomicity of loads and stores on x86
- C++11 auto: what if it gets a constant reference?