Why is integer assignment on a naturally aligned variable atomic on x86?

by

More Related Contents:

  1. When to use volatile with multi threading?
  2. Can modern x86 hardware not store a single byte to memory?
  3. Atomicity on x86
  4. Where is the lock for a std::atomic?
  5. Can a bool read/write operation be not atomic on x86? [duplicate]
  6. How to atomically update a maximum value?
  7. Atomicity in C++ : Myth or Reality
  8. Acquire/Release versus Sequentially Consistent memory order
  9. Atomicity of loads and stores on x86
  10. How to get the CPU cycle count in x86_64 from C++?
  11. Why does C++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture run faster than hand-written assembly?
  12. Deoptimizing a program for the pipeline in Intel Sandybridge-family CPUs
  13. How to implement atoi using SIMD?
  14. What does it mean to align the stack?
  15. How to implement multithread safe singleton in C++11 without using
  16. Atomic operations, std::atomic and ordering of writes
  17. What happens when a computer program runs?
  18. Is there any compiler barrier which is equal to asm(“” ::: “memory”) in C++11?
  19. How to generate assembly code with clang in Intel syntax?
  20. How to enable experimental C++11 concurrency features in MinGW?
  21. Why are std::atomic objects not copyable?
  22. Does hardware memory barrier make visibility of atomic operations faster in addition to providing necessary guarantees?
  23. Do I have to use atomic for “exit” bool variable?
  24. Address of function is not actual code address
  25. Aligning static string literals
  26. Atomically increment two integers with CAS
  27. What are these seemingly-useless callq instructions in my x86 object files for?
  28. Is a memory barrier required to read a value that is atomically modified?
  29. How to count clock cycles with RDTSC in GCC x86? [duplicate]
  30. Why is this SIMD multiplication not faster than non-SIMD multiplication?

Leave a Comment