More Related Contents:
- Why is integer assignment on a naturally aligned variable atomic on x86?
- Atomicity on x86
- Where is the lock for a std::atomic?
- Atomicity of loads and stores on x86
- Why does C++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture run faster than hand-written assembly?
- Can modern x86 hardware not store a single byte to memory?
- Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviations with _mm_popcnt_u64 on Intel CPUs
- Deoptimizing a program for the pipeline in Intel Sandybridge-family CPUs
- String literal matches bool overload instead of std::string
- How to implement multithread safe singleton in C++11 without using
- What does the “lock” instruction mean in x86 assembly?
- C++ : why bool is 8 bits long?
- What do each memory_order mean?
- inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘__m256d _mm256_broadcast_sd(const double*)’
- Why the sizeof(bool) is not defined to be one, by the Standard itself?
- Using bitwise operators for Booleans in C++
- How to atomically update a maximum value?
- Can I force cache coherency on a multicore x86 CPU?
- Why is the volatile qualifier used through out std::atomic?
- Is !! a safe way to convert to bool in C++?
- Converting bool to text in C++
- Are there in x86 any instructions to accelerate SHA (SHA1/2/256/512) encoding?
- x86 MUL Instruction from VS 2008/2010
- How to do an atomic increment and fetch in C?
- c++, std::atomic, what is std::memory_order and how to use them?
- Are C/C++ fundamental types atomic?
- C++11 memory_order_acquire and memory_order_release semantics?
- C++ bool returns 0 1 instead of true false
- Why do I see 400x outlier timings when calling clock_gettime repeatedly?
- Acquire/Release versus Sequentially Consistent memory order