Why does ast.literal_eval(‘5 * 7’) fail?

ast.literal_eval() accepts + in the evaluated data because 5+2j (complex number*) are valid literals. The same applies to -. To keep the code simple, no attempt is made to exclude + or - as a binary operators.

No other operators are allowed; the function is supposed to only accept literals, not expressions.

In other words, that 5 + 7 works is a bug, but one that is hard to fix without breaking support for constructing complex numbers. The implementation limits the use to operands that are numbers, unary + and -, or other binary operators (so you can’t use these to concatenate lists or produce a set difference).

Also see several related Python bugtracker entries: #25335 ast.literal_eval fails to parse numbers with leading “+”, #22525 ast.literal_eval() doesn’t do what the documentation says and #4907 ast.literal_eval does not properly handled complex numbers


* Technically speaking, 2j is a valid literal; Python parses 5+2j as int(5) binop(+) complex(0, 2), and only later produces a complex(5, 2) object from the result, when actually executing the addition.

Leave a Comment