Why does GCC generate 15-20% faster code if I optimize for size instead of speed?

by

More Related Contents:

  1. How to remove “noise” from GCC/clang assembly output?
  2. Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?
  3. gcc optimization flag -O3 makes code slower than -O2
  4. Why is my program slow when looping over exactly 8192 elements?
  5. Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviations with _mm_popcnt_u64 on Intel CPUs
  6. __builtin_prefetch, How much does it read?
  7. Why does the enhanced GCC 6 optimizer break practical C++ code?
  8. Preventing compiler optimizations while benchmarking
  9. Why is std::fill(0) slower than std::fill(1)?
  10. Which types on a 64-bit computer are naturally atomic in gnu C and gnu C++? — meaning they have atomic reads, and atomic writes
  11. GCC: Difference between -O3 and -Os
  12. GCC -Wuninitialized / -Wmaybe-uninitialized issues
  13. Using bts assembly instruction with gcc compiler
  14. Measuring exception handling overhead in C++
  15. Regarding time out in code
  16. How do you get assembler output from C/C++ source in gcc?
  17. Is there a 128 bit integer in gcc?
  18. How to turn on (literally) ALL of GCC’s warnings?
  19. experimental::filesystem linker error
  20. How to recompile with -fPIC
  21. C++ compilation bug?
  22. Labels in GCC inline assembly
  23. Is auto as a parameter in a regular function a GCC 4.9 extension?
  24. 😃 (and other Unicode characters) in identifiers not allowed by g++
  25. Inherit interfaces which share a method name
  26. OSX – replace gcc version 4.2.1 with 4.9 installed via Homebrew
  27. How can I turn on (literally) ALL of GCC’s warnings?
  28. Referencing memory operands in .intel_syntax GNU C inline assembly
  29. Can I hint the optimizer by giving the range of an integer?
  30. What does exactly the warning mean about hidden symbol being referenced by DSO?

Leave a Comment