Answer recommended by Intel
More Related Contents:
- Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviations with _mm_popcnt_u64 on Intel CPUs
- Why is std::fill(0) slower than std::fill(1)?
- How to get the CPU cycle count in x86_64 from C++?
- Why does C++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture run faster than hand-written assembly?
- What C/C++ compiler can use push pop instructions for creating local variables, instead of just increasing esp once?
- Is using double faster than float?
- Trial-division code runs 2x faster as 32-bit on Windows than 64-bit on Linux
- Why does GCC generate 15-20% faster code if I optimize for size instead of speed?
- What are these seemingly-useless callq instructions in my x86 object files for?
- Why do I see 400x outlier timings when calling clock_gettime repeatedly?
- Why is this SIMD multiplication not faster than non-SIMD multiplication?
- What is a “cache-friendly” code?
- Is < faster than
- Does the C++ standard mandate poor performance for iostreams, or am I just dealing with a poor implementation?
- What is IACA and how do I use it?
- Performance of built-in types : char vs short vs int vs. float vs. double
- Floating point vs integer calculations on modern hardware
- What kind of optimization does const offer in C/C++?
- Ternary operator ?: vs if…else
- while (1) Vs. for (;;) Is there a speed difference?
- How do objects work in x86 at the assembly level?
- Performance issue for vector::size() in a loop in C++
- inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘__m256d _mm256_broadcast_sd(const double*)’
- How to alpha blend RGBA unsigned byte color fast?
- Can const-correctness improve performance?
- x86 MUL Instruction from VS 2008/2010
- Why is processing an unsorted array the same speed as processing a sorted array with modern x86-64 clang?
- Performance penalty for working with interfaces in C++?
- Memory-efficient C++ strings (interning, ropes, copy-on-write, etc) [closed]
- How to count clock cycles with RDTSC in GCC x86? [duplicate]